Sense and Sensibility

Upholding Originality and Trust in Scholarly Communication

When diving into the philosophy behind scientific truth, we can’t overlook the insightful words of Richard Feynman in The Meaning of It All: “No government has the right to decide on the truth of scientific principles, nor to prescribe in any way the character of the questions investigated.”1 This powerful statement highlights the essential need for intellectual freedom within the scientific community. It encourages us to foster a culture that celebrates curiosity and creative thought, allowing these to flourish without external pressures. Creating a space where scientists can engage in rational discourse, grounded in ethical values, is key to the advancement of knowledge.

Yet, the role of researchers goes beyond just unleashing their creativity. Upholding ethical standards throughout the publication process is crucial for maintaining the integrity of scientific work. Originality stands as a vital cornerstone of scientific exploration; any straying from this principle risks crossing into plagiarism, which can erode the foundations of academic trust.

While plagiarism is not classified as a crime, it represents a serious breach of academic ethics and should always be met with strong disapproval. When individuals resort to dishonest practices, they open themselves up to significant consequences, including potential censure or dismissal from their academic institutions. A recent situation involving a well-known scientist and the chairman of a governmental research institute in India effectively illustrates these concerns.2 They, along with their students, faced scrutiny for submitting a paper to Advanced Materials that contained sections improperly copied from another source. Though the editorial board of the journal found the event did not warrant a retraction, they responsibly chose to publish an apology from the authors alongside the paper. This incident serves as a vital reminder of the importance of originality and ethical accountability in academic writing, no matter the scale of the misstep.

To firmly support the principles of publication ethics, the editorial board of the Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science enforces robust review protocols for all submitted manuscripts. We are proud to collaborate with Crossref, an esteemed non-profit organization that strives to enhance the identification and accessibility of reliable online content. One of Crossref’s key services is Crosscheck, a cutting-edge plagiarism detection tool we rely on to maintain the integrity of our submissions. Through this invaluable platform, we have identified potential instances of plagiarism and have proactively reached out to corresponding authors to encourage their commitment to ethical practices.

As we earnestly invite submissions of truly innovative research, it’s imperative to recognize the significance of publication ethics within the scientific landscape. By embracing transparency and integrity throughout the entire research and publication process, we create an environment that not only propels knowledge forward but also reinforces the moral framework of the scientific community. This dedication to ethical scholarship fuels our collective progress and ensures the ongoing reliability of academic endeavors. Together, we can contribute to a vibrant and trustworthy scholarly environment that inspires future generations of researchers.

Elaborating on the original publication:

https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.1.1

References

1. Feynman RP. The meaning of it all: thoughts of a citizen-scientist. New York (NY): Addison-Wesley, 1998.

2. PM’s science adviser apologises for plagiarism in science journal. The Times of India [Internet]. 2012 Feb 20 [cited 2025 Aug 31]. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pms-science-adviser-apologises-for-plagiarism-in-science-journal/articleshow/11965854.cms